The House of Mirrors

Recent statements by Finance Minister, Ron Liepert, confirm my suspicion that politics is like a House of Mirrors.  Not a transparent glass house (no stone throwing allowed), but the maze-like puzzle boxes you find at amusement parks and the midway.  The challenge of the maze is heightened by mirrors and panes of glass which disorient the players who catch a glimpse of the real world beyond the glass but wonder if they’ll ever get there.

How did Mr Liepert create such an unsettling image?  Surely you jest.  OK seriously, consider this.  In August Mr Snelgrove, interim Finance Minister, presented the Q1 financial report.  It was a jolly report, full of optimism for the future.  It predicted a balanced budget by the end of the 2011/2012 budget year due to an infusion of new revenues.*  Mr Liepert, ever supportive, heartily agreed with him.  At the time Mr Liepert was the Energy Minister responsible for the oil, natural gas and coal industries that would be creating these revenues.  Presumably he had a solid understanding of the economic forces driving the industries in his portfolio.

Fast forward 2 months.  Mr Liepert is stripped of the powerful Energy portfolio and now finds himself toiling in the unglamourous Finance portfolio.  (No offense to all the accountants out there).  Make no mistake, Finance is a powerful portfolio, but its influence is moderated by Treasury, now under Doug Horner.  In the Cabinet’s order of precedence Mr Liepert is now 2 levels lower than the Energy Minister, sandwiched between Health and Education.

Mr Liepert is a feisty man.  It took him 8 days to find his footing in his new ministry.  On the 8th day he met with the press to announce dark days ahead.  He said that although he had originally agreed with Mr Snelgrove’s Q1 financial report he was now “much less optimistic” that the PCs would be able to balance the 2011/2012 budget.  He blamed this nasty turn of events on the deterioration of the world economy, its impact on energy prices and the Heritage trust fund and the fact that there was no “low hanging fruit” (eg. easy items) left in the budget to cut.  Really?  I would urge Mr Liepert to take a careful look at the $14 million budget of the Public Affairs Bureau (also known as the PC propaganda machine).  But I digress.

At first blush, Mr Liepert’s statement sounds plausible—but think about it for a moment.  What happened between August and October to cause Mr Liepert to make such a dramatic about-face.  Did the world turn upside down in the last 2 months?  Sure, the global economy is volatile, but what is the impact of that volatility on Alberta?

Here’s what some experts (who don’t have a political agenda) say about Alberta’s economic prospects:

  • Gregory Ebel, CEO of Spectra Energy, a US natural gas company with interests in Canada says there’s a “gas renaissance” coming and if gas prices stay in the US$3 to 5, or $4 to 6 range (which forecasters believe is achievable) “everybody can win”.**
  • Greg Stringham, VP with Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) says “We expect to see substantial growth, maybe not at the same pace we saw a few years ago, but at least we’ve come out of the recession in a manner that shows some growth in the oil business.” ***

This prognosis is borne out by the land sales statistics.  The province of Alberta owns 81% of all of the oil, natural gas and other minerals in the province.  It sells these resources to oil and gas companies in “land sales”.  The number of land sales/year is a good indication of the industry’s confidence in the future.  In 2006 revenue from land sales hit an all time record high of $3.43 billion due to heavy spending by the oil sands industry.  Land sales revenue to-date is $3.24 billion—that’s just $200 million short of the 2006 record and there are still 4 land sales left to go before we close off 2011.

Now, I’m not an economist or industry expert, but it looks to me like the industry is feeling pretty optimistic about its future.  Oops, watch it…you just walked into a glass wall!  That glass wall is intended to deflect you from your destination, which in this case is a balanced approach to spending on public services.

Mr Liepert says he will table a budget in Feb 2012.  In order to do so he needs to forge an alignment in caucus which balances the PC’s desire for a balanced budget against the public’s desire to protect public service spending.  What drives this balance?  The litmus test according to Mr Liepert is what caucus is prepared to “sell on the doorsteps…”

Of course!  Developing a budget is ultimately a political exercise not a financial or economic one.  Therefore the optimistic perspective of the industry experts is irrelevant.

Mr Liepert is simply fulfilling his mandate to ensure that the PCs are re-elected next spring.  The biggest challenge facing the PCs today is trying to be more fiscally conservative than the Wildrose.  How will the PCs justify a harsh budget when industry forecasters don’t support their position?  Well, take a page from the Republican playbook—manufacture or exaggerate a crisis and run with it.  In the US, it was the war on terrorism, in Alberta it may be the volatile global economy.  The fact that economic forecasts don’t support the need to butcher the budget is irrelevant, we’re in the House of Mirrors afterall.

On Monday, Oct 24 the Legislature meets for the first time under Premier Redford.  It will sit for 2 days.  Ms Redford decided that the best use of her time was to discuss the global economic crisis.  What?  Let’s see whether Ms Redford uses this opportunity to set the stage for deep budget cuts across the board.

If she does, remember this:  politics may be a House of Mirrors, but Government is not.

*Calgary Herald Oct 18, 2011, A4

**Financial Post, Oct 21, 2011, FP5

***Calgary Herald OnLine, Oct 20, 2011

****Daily Oil Bulletin, Oct 2011,

This entry was posted in Politics and Government, Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The House of Mirrors

  1. Carlos Beca says:

    Liepert being Lipert that is all I can say. I am still trying to understand what is it that Alison Redford has in mind. The only thing I can come up with is that she is trying to beat Danielle Smith in the Spring election and so she pushes to the right. One never knows these days.

    As far as these sudden changes in the financial state of the province, at first I thought it were just because of the difficult nature of running a province this large but I now believe this is pure incompetence and lack of management skills to see the whole picture.

    I confess I do not agree with the two comments from oil companies CEO in your post. I believe Canada is in worse financial shape than it seems. The only reason we look so stable is only because most of the world is in horrible shape. Furthermore I am appaled at the atitude of Mr. Flaherty scolding other finance ministers around the world in a somewhat arrogant way. When he was minister of finances in Ontario he left the province with annual deficits of 5 billion dollars but claiming surpluses. He also inherited a country full of cash that Paul Martin left behind and with at least 7 years of consecutive surpluses. They already spent all of that and are now playing the nouveau rich card and throwing money everywhere. I think a rude awakening is coming soon and more cuts of course. This is the neo-conservative vicious circle. Cut taxes to corporations, get in a deficit situation, cut in social programs to balance the budget, and back in cut taxes again.

    Finally I do not believe anyone will touch the Public Affairs Bureau. That is the PC spinning machine and they have done an amazing job for them. It is designed like the Nazi propaganda machine and it is quite obvious that it works.


    • Carlos, I think you’re absolutely correct in your view that Redford is pushing to the right in order to beat Danielle Smith and the Wildrose in the next election. When Redford was first elected, there was some concern in the Alberta Party (and maybe even the Liberals) that Redford would move the PC’s closer to the center and scoop up potential Alberta Party voters. But it looks like Redford might do just the opposite and move right in order to stop losing more voters to the Wildrose. Probably a good strategy given that the Liberals, the NDP and the AP aren’t polling high enough to be a real threat. This does not bode well for Albertans for the reasons you set out.

      We have to find a way to get more Albertans involved in the political process.

  2. Carlos Beca says:

    I totally agree. The center left in Alberta cannot get their act together and form a coalition in order to be a real opposition or even the government. With the electoral system we have it is basically impossible to resolve the lack of political mixture any healthy democracy needs in order to evolve and thrive. Interestingly enough none of the parties in Alberta seems to have a concern about this issue and push for proportional representation and so many people have basically given up on the whole system. I find this situation absolutely intolerable. Hyper Individualism has reached a point of no return in North America and it is damaging our societies way more than what people think. Furthermore the brain washing against anything more social democrat has created a unique situation I find troubling. It is very easy to get people involved – we need democracy and we do not have it as much as we want to believe we do. We have a free voting system not a democracy.

  3. Alison Redford’s decision to invoke Standing Order 30 to discuss “a matter of urgent public importance”, ie. the impact of the global economic crisis on Alberta and then turning the discussion into a quasi Throne Speech was an appalling misuse of power. Ms Redford has let down many of the people who helped her win the leadership. We won’t forget when we go into the polling booth next spring. Thanks for your comments Carlos.

  4. Carlos Beca says:

    Well Susan I apologize for writing another post (third) but I have to confess that Alison Redford has been the greatest political flip-flop I have seen in a long while. I was not expecting any of this at all. The Edmonton Journal also had something on the health inquiry yesterday but I did not have a chance to read so I am not sure what it was about, but the title suggested she also had backed off proceeding with the inquiry. If that is true, I for one stop even caring for what she does next. The objective now is getting rid of her period. These people have no shame whatsoever. Lying is now the common narrative in politics. If I was a youn kid today I would do exactly what they are doing – abandon the sinking ship.

  5. Carlos, it does appear that Alison Redford is waffling on her commitment to call a judicial inquiry. It’s a little unclear what she has in mind but she says she wants to wait until after the Health Quality Council finishes its review in Feb 2012. How much do you want to bet she’ll call an election in March and all of the cabinet ministers who were worried about being exposed in a judicial inquiry will be off the hook.

    Very disheartening, but this also gives those of us who supported her even more incentive to go out there and support the opposition.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s